Sequoia Realty Corp. is the commercial leader in Lake and surrounding counties.
Sequoia Realty
At Sequoia Realty we focus on two overlapping commercial real estate markets in Northeast Ohio.
Sequoia Realty
The first market is retail, office and industrial properties in Lake and adjacent counties. In this arena we help our clients buy, sell and lease business real estate and business opportunities. From a corner coffee shop to large industrial facilities, we provide focused expertise.
Sequoia Realty
The second market is investment realty throughout Northeast Ohio: from Columbus north, Lorain/Elyria east, to Lake Erie and the Ohio eastern border. We track significant income-producing properties valued at $1 million and more. If you are looking to benefit from cash flow, loan amortization, appreciation and tax advantages, we can help.
Sequoia Realty
Sequoia Realty Corp. uses a team approach in conducting our daily business so to better service our customer and client’s needs. We dedicate our full energy and attention which means, when you have a question, ANYONE in the office will be able to assist you in obtaining an answer. Your inquiry is important and our goal includes doing everything possible to answer your questions and help you with your real estate needs.
Sequoia Realty Corp. Brokers Sale of 7501 Carnegie Ave to Cleveland Food Hub
Patrick Dowd,
Vice President of Sequoia Realty Corp, brokered the sale of 7501 Carnegie
Avenue in Cleveland, Ohio to Cleveland Food Hub. When Sequoia lists a property
for sale, they take a multi-faceted approach to marketing including networking
within the broker community. Through this networking it was Eliot Kijewski of
Cushman & Wakefield | CRESCO Real Estate who was able to secure a buyer for
the property.
The 7501
Carnegie property, which features 137,670 square feet of temperature-controlled
food grade space, is located in Cleveland’s resurging MidTown district (this is
Sequoia’s second significant transaction in Midtown in a month having
represented the buyer at 4020 Payne.) The new facility, purchased by entrepreneurs
Gordon Priemer and Eric Diamond, will house their innovative new venture, the
Cleveland Food Hub. The Food Hub will house tenants including their existing Cleveland
Culinary Launch and Kitchen (CCLK), currently located at 2800 Euclid Avenue.
CCLK was formed in 2018 to help launch or grow local food businesses by
offering fully equipped shared commercial kitchen space, business support, classes
and workshops, mentorship and networking opportunities. The new facility will
not only house the incubator, but also offer manufacturing, food co-packing,
and warehousing for local craft food entrepreneurs. Additionally, there will be
retail space along Carnegie. Tenants who are already signed on for the space
include Souper Market and Cleveland Bagel – two local favorites.
Finding the right buyer for a specialized
facility such as this is not always a simple task. After a year of working with
another commercial realtor, Greg Fritz, President of Produce Packaging, Inc.
turned to Patrick Dowd with Sequoia to sell the 7501 Carnegie property.
“Patrick and Sequoia did a terrific job,” stated Fritz. “They generated a lot
of activity and got a lot of potential buyers to visit our facility.”
Among the
potential buyers, Dowd and Kijewski found a match with Priemer and Diamond’s
Food Hub. “The experience was absolutely great,” Diamond explained, “Patrick
[Dowd] from Sequoia could not have been more responsive or professional.
It was this attitude that allowed this somewhat complex transaction to
move to completion. Both he and Eliot [Kijewski] worked incredibly hard
on this deal.”
The hard
work on the part of all parties has paid off. Construction on the facility is
well underway and the first tenants are set to move in on May 1.
####
Sequoia Realty Corp., based in Mentor, Ohio, has been
serving commercial Real Estate needs in Northeast Ohio for over 30 years. Sequoia
Realty focuses on two overlapping commercial real estate markets in Northeast
Ohio. The first market is retail, office and industrial properties in Lake and
adjacent counties. The second market is investment realty, specifically
income-producing properties valued at $1 million and more. Sequoia Realty uses
a team approach in conducting daily business enabling better service to its
clients.For information, please contact
Rick Ferris, President, Sequoia Realty Corp., 440.946.8600 or rick@sequoiarealty.com.
Not far from the sparkling
new, $1.5-billion Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta’s low-income Vine
City neighborhood, Rosario Hernandez is in charge of a two-lot garden
with raised beds that produced tomatoes, green beans and peppers this
past summer and fall.
“People going to Falcons’ football games can’t see what we’re
doing, but folks in Vine City are happy that we cleaned up those lots
and are growing things,” said the retired elementary school teacher.
“Why, we even have a pollinator garden that was filled with butterflies
flitting from flower to flower during the growing season.”
The Vine City effort, dubbed “Hope With Gardens,” is just one
small part of the burgeoning urban agriculture movement that is gaining
strength around the country, experts say, encompassing everything from
small plots in impoverished neighborhoods, to high-tech greenhouses on
city rooftops, to new developments that include community gardens and
small farms.
Victory gardens were big during World War II in the United States
when the government rationed sugar, butter, milk, cheese, eggs, coffee,
meat and canned goods, said Anne Palmer with the Center for a Livable
Future at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in
Baltimore.
A generation later, gardening got a boost in the 1970s, she said,
and it’s blossoming again in the 21st Century “under the umbrella term
of urban agriculture that’s hitting a couple of different notes than it
did in previous times,” she said.
“For Baltimore, Cleveland, Detroit and other cities, urban
agriculture is being used as a mechanism to address a lot of unused
urban land and shrinking populations,” she said.
“Cities officials are looking around and asking what do we do
with all this unused property? They don’t want it to just grow weeds and
be blighted. They want to use that space for growing food and
recreation and contributing to a sense of community.”
A number of cities have passed regulations to promote gardening
and even farming on a small scale, sometimes with mixed results. “But
it’s a movement that’s going to continue and new growers will come on
when others drop out,” she said.
In addition to providing fresh produce for people who live in
so-called “food deserts” — where grocery stores are often few and far
between — schools and teachers are using gardens as a learning platform
to get kids interested in growing food, creating good eating habits and
learning about environmental health.
“They aren’t about making money per se, more about building
community, providing nutritious food, job training and things like that,
which is why they often need city support and soft funding from grants.
“Gardens can have other benefits, too, because they often
encourage landlords to fix up their properties,” Hernandez added. “Green
spaces in general are associated with lower crime rates and increased
home values and community gardens are a part of that. REALTORS® will
point to them as an asset because they build what we call ‘social
capital.’ And these gardens aren’t just for poor areas, either, because
developers have jumped on the community garden bandwagon, too.”
Ag in Atlanta raises communities
In Vine City, Hernandez said the Historic Westside Gardens (HWG)
group negotiated with the elderly lady who owned the lots to start the
gardens five years ago. She joined HWG three years ago and trained with
Truly Living Well, an organization that runs a successful community
garden in the Asheville Heights neighborhood of Atlanta. She also has a
large garden in her backyard, where her grandchildren come to pick fresh
vegetables in season.
REALTORS® point to community gardens as an asset.
Hernandez said she hopes to start a community garden in the
English Avenue neighborhood where she lives and where she estimates 70
percent of the buildings are boarded up. It, too, is close to the new
stadium.
“I think gardens could help turn things around,” she said. “The
city says affordable housing is coming, but it takes time. I’m hoping we
can work with Habitat for Humanity or some group like that to get lots
and take it from there.”
Mario Cambardella, who was hired as Atlanta’s first director of
urban agriculture in 2015, credits Mayor Kasim Reed for the community
gardening push. Cambardella, who studied landscape architecture at the
University of Georgia, said Reed wanted to put the city on a track to
eliminate 75 percent of the city’s food deserts by 2020.
These deserts, defined as low-income neighborhoods with low
access to markets with fresh food, had dropped from 56 percent in 2010
to 36 percent in 2017, according to some estimates. That was thanks, in
part, to the increase in community gardens and the opening of new
farmers’ markets, including four at Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit
Authority (MARTA) train stations in the city.
Cambardella’s department coordinates a variety of programs,
including six urban garden sites in low-income neighborhoods that are
about a quarter-acre each. The sites came from surplus city land and the
city worked out five-year agreements with community groups to “farm”
the properties.
“We have a lot of surplus land in parts of Atlanta, but few that
are suitable for growing because of our tree canopy,” Cambardella said.
“We’re known as the ‘City in the Forest’ for good reason. We love our
trees, but they can make it hard to garden.”
Cambardella, who grew up in Atlanta, cited the Collegetown
community garden on a former public housing site as a success story. It
has programs that teach residents how to grow their own vegetables using
raised beds, prepare and store produce and how to manage hoop houses
for growing fruits and vegetables hydroponically from the spring into
the fall.
“In Atlanta, urban agriculture serves four core values,” he said.
“They are ecological literacy, cultural relevancy, health and nutrition
and economic development.
“One house there tells a poignant story about economic gain. When
the garden opened 18 months ago, a home across from the garden entry
was selling for $18,000. Six months ago, an investor bought it, fixed it
up and it’s now on the market for $200,000. So these gardens are not
only lighthouses for nutrition and community, but they can have a major
impact on the surrounding neighborhoods.”
Next up is a 7.1-acre “food forest” park in the southeast Atlanta
neighborhood of Browns Mill, which is being developed by the city in
conjunction with the U.S. Forest Service and other partners.
“Seattle has an edible urban forest garden on Beacon Hill that
we’ve visited, but their’s is only 7 acres,” he quipped. “And I’m mighty
proud of our additional .1 acre.” The city also has secured easements
under Georgia Power lines that are larger — ranging from a half-acre to a
full-acre — where urban farmers can grow crops for sale, he said.
Seattle’s growing opportunties
Seattle’s permaculture food forest dates to 2009, but its
community gardening programs go back more than four decades to 1973,
when the city acquired the Picardo Farms property in northeast Seattle
and launched what came to be called the “P-Patch” program.
It began when a student said a community garden on a portion of
the land would be a good way of teaching children about food and how to
grow it, said Richard Fink II, who runs the Community Assets Division
for the Seattle Department of Neighborhoods.
The city now has 90 P-Patch gardens in every corner and nook and
cranny of the city, he said, noting the original patch is still being
worked. It now covers nearly 100,000 square feet with more than 250
individual plots. The wait time to get a plot is six to 12 months,
according to a city website.
“Each P-Patch is different and reflects the interests and
geography of the neighborhoods,” Fink said. Some are owned by the parks
department and other agencies, while others are on private land.
“It varies from plot to plot,” he said. “Some are under power
lines, others are built up on the sides of roads. Others in the middle
of neighborhoods, while others are inside of parks.”
More than 3,100 people from all walks of life participated in the
program this past summer. “With each garden, it’s primarily people from
that geographic area with the gardens reflecting the demographic makeup
of the neighborhood,” he explained.
Some, for example, would include families, with plots now being
gardened by the children or grandchildren of those who started in the
1970s. Others, near a college, would have more students and faculty
maintaining plots.
“At other P-Patches, we have community groups run by people with
the intention of giving what’s grown in those plots to food banks
located near the patch,” he said.
The program has 32 acres in cultivation, mainly growing organic
produce, though there are also some fruit trees. “We absolutely consider
it a success,” he said. “It is one of the largest and oldest community
gardening programs in the entire country.
“Our overarching goals, in addition to raising vegetables and
fruits, is for these patches to provide a gathering place for the
community to share ideas, as well as to boost residents’ pride in where
they live. It certainly contributes to a healthier urban environment
here in Seattle. It’s a lot about camaraderie.”
Because the P-Patches are well known in their neighborhoods,
Seattle recently designated all of them as emergency gathering places.
In the event of any kind of disaster like an earthquake or fire, he said
people know they can congregate there to share information and
resources. “That’s just a natural extension of the community gardening
program,” he said.
The Denver Plots
In Denver, Fatuma Emmad is the director of Urban Farms for the
nonprofit group known as Groundwork and supervises three acres of
gardens in low-income neighborhoods across Denver and runs
“pay-what-youcan” farmsteads.
The largest plot of land she oversees is called the “Sisters
Garden,” which covers one acre, has a greenhouse and is next to Regis
University in the Aria neighborhood in northwest Denver.
Located in what Emmad calls a food desert, the garden is a
collaboration between the university and Groundwork and is part of the
school’s “Cultivate Health Project,” aimed at promoting healthy living
in the area.
“When the nuns sold the land where the garden is located, which
includes a former apple orchard and a nunnery that is now cooperative
housing, they required the developers to have a farm and mixed-income
housing,” she said of the neighborhood, which is close to downtown and
on the edge of an area that is rapidly being gentrified.
“We are lucky to have this, because land is at such a premium
here in Denver,” added Emmad, a native of Ethiopia who grew up in Denver
and ran her own urban agriculture company before joining Groundwork.
“I like growing things and helping bring people together,” she
said. “We have classes on canning, improving the soil, salad-making and
even free yoga in the Sisters Garden. We try to be sustaining, too, by
selling high-quality produce to restaurants, but our scope is broader
than that.”
Vertical Farming Near the Big Apple
Nearly 2,000 miles away in Brooklyn, New York, Henry Gordon-Smith
has turned his blog into a business called Agritecture, which offers
hydroponic and soil greenhouse — both rooftop and ground-based —
“vertical” farming and other urban agriculture consulting services to
clients around the globe.
A native of Hong Kong who spent his early years there and in
Tokyo, Gordon-Smith said he developed a “thing for parks in Asia and how
they use space.”
“But I didn’t grow up with a green thumb,” said Gordon- Smith.
“And it wasn’t until I got to New York City five years ago that I
started to get hands-on experience by volunteering at urban farms.”
Before that, he said potential clients said they liked his ideas,
but were reluctant to hire him because he had little experience getting
his hands in the dirt (or water) and had not actually grown fruits or
vegetables.
Gordon-Smith, 31, said he caught the urban agriculture bug when
he was a student in Vancouver, British Columbia studying political
science. He met and wrote about people who were farming backyards in his
Agritecture blog “because I thought their ideas about food and water
security were very interesting.
“Initially, I thought I’d enter the foreign service, but I had an
itch to scratch and thought urban gardening was something worth
exploring. Most of all, I really like designing systems visually,
figuring out how things relate and coming up with a business model to
make it all work.”
At first, he created what he calls “a digital space to talk about
how urban agriculture can play a role in cities of the future and
juxtaposed that with what was happening in the industry at the time.” He
adds, “I became an industry commentator, began to speak at events and
over time, became a go-to guy for people who had a building, wanted to
start a farm and wanted advice on what they could grow.”
He recruited an interdisciplinary team with engineers, growers
and plant scientists who helped him develop what he calls “a methodology
around feasibility studies for urban agriculture.” Most of his clients
have been in the Northeast, but Agritecture has consulted on projects in
Europe, Mexico and as far away as Shanghai, China.
Gordon-Smith has developed a niche in vertical farming — the
practice of growing food in vertically stacked layers or inclined
surfaces in controlled settings — and co-founded the Association of
Vertical Farming.
One of the largest hydroponic vertical farms in the country is
located in Newark, N.J., where a company called Aerofarms produces leafy
greens in a 69,000-squarefoot greenhouse.
They come in smaller sizes, too, he noted. The ski town of
Jackson, Wyo., where snow is often on the ground eight months a year, is
home to a 4,500-square-foot vertical greenhouse that turns out upwards
of 100,000 pounds of fresh produce annually, most of which is snapped up
by local restaurants, or sold in a retail market in the greenhouse.
But growing vegetables isn’t the only reason for the indoor
hanging garden’s existence. More than a dozen people who have
disabilities such as spina bifida, autism, Down syndrome or have seizure
disorders work at the garden, a public-private partnership.
“They took the facade of a three-story parking garage and
converted it into a vertical farm,” Gordon-Smith said. “That’s pretty
creative. But really, it’s like a rooftop that is vertical. Just imagine
a south-facing building with a six-to-10-foot deep skin where you grow
vegetables and also generate solar heat.”
Gordon-Smith said his company looks at the “full spectrum of urban agriculture in the context of real estate and urban planning.
“All along the way, there are aesthetic, ecological and economic
impacts and tradeoffs. It’s really about identifying the right solutions
for each area. But as consultants, we get more requests on the
high-tech side because the capital costs are higher, it’s an area where a
lot of mistakes have been made, and where there is a lot of hype and
excitement at the moment.”
He said his vision for urban agriculture is ambitious. “We’re
demonstrating the positive impacts of these kinds of farms across the
spectrum, in such a way that cities will see the benefits of
incentivizing them and that large corporations will understand the value
of integrating them into what they do.
“I want cities to be more productive and I think agriculture is a
way to do that. Rainwater harvesting and energy production is part of
that, but I want cities everywhere to be more than places that consume
energy and then generate waste, but have positive outputs.
“Rooftops alone have a huge amount of potential. Another one is
basements. I’ve been lobbying New York to allow people to grow food
there,” said Gordon-Smith.
“If you look at housing projects, they have enormous basements.
The technology of growing food indoors has gotten much more affordable
and viable, but the building codes have not kept up with the technology.
I think cities need to find a way to let people make use of all kinds
of usable space for growing food.”
Brian E. Clark is a Wisconsin-based journalist and a former
staff writer on the business desk of The San Diego Union-Tribune. He is a
contributor to the Los Angeles Times, Chicago Sun-Times, Milwaukee
Journal Sentinel, Dallas Morning News and other publications.
Complete Streets policies help to meet population demands on infrastructure
By David Goldberg
Streets have always been the
workhorses of the cityscape. No matter the era, they serve as the
indispensable lifelines that allow people to move and commerce to
function.
But ideas about how — and by whom — streets are designed and the
priorities that shape them can change from generation to generation. In
the 1960s, as urban cores were decanting population to their suburbs,
traffic engineers took the lead in redesigning city streets to be more
like those of their car-oriented “competitors.”
Today, as many cities are scrambling to manage resurgent
population growth and increasing density, urban streets are being
overhauled in a radically different direction. Much of the change is a
response to the sheer volume of people and vehicles. To move more
people, “many cities are trying to redesign streets overbuilt for cars
to be safer for walking and biking and improve transit speed and
reliability,” said Aaron Villere of the National Association of City
Transportation Officials (NACTO).
Growing cities are finding that streets must not only serve as
the urban circulatory system, but the same right-of-way also must act as
the kidneys and lungs of the municipal organism — clearing waste from
storm water, improving air quality and providing space for residents to
breathe. “With fast-growing places, each bit of green needs to be
optimized for human benefit and ecological function,” said Dr. Kathleen
Wolf, a researcher at the University of Washington who has spent years
investigating the role of urban vegetation, in collaboration with the
U.S. Forest Service. “And to the degree possible, each piece of right of
way needs to be optimized for green.”
Some cities now are beginning to take steps to fuse several strains of fresh thinking that have emerged over
the last decade or so. “Complete streets” policies — adopted by
more than 1,200 cities — aim to convert streets designed primarily for
car traffic to also provide protected space for people on foot, bicycle
or getting to transit. More than 30 U.S. cities, ranging in size from
Macon, Ga., to New York City, are pursuing Vision Zero goals, trying
with a combination of street design, education and enforcement to bring
traffic deaths to zero in coming years. To meet requirements for water
quality and grapple with intensifying rainfalls under climate change,
many cities are supplementing concrete pipe systems with “green
stormwater infrastructure” (GSI) that uses vegetated areas to collect
and filter water. And with a growing body of research showing that the
“urban forest” provides ecological, economic and even public health
benefits, cities such as Seattle have created aggressive programs to
preserve and expand tree canopy coverage.
How do these threads weave together? “Trees and other plants
clean the air, add economic value to real estate and commercial sales
and they make places where people want to be,” said John Massengale,
author with Victor Dover of Street Design: the Secret to Great Cities and Towns.
“Perhaps most importantly, they slow cars down, which is critical to
achieving Vision Zero. If we slow cars down to 20 mph or less, almost
nobody will be killed whether pedestrian, cyclist or driver.”
The notion that street trees promote safety is heresy to a
previous generation of traffic engineers, who worked to eliminate sturdy
trunks that could be a hazard to motorists should they swerve off the
road. But it’s true, said Wolf. Her evaluation of years of research
shows that, while trees might be a hazard in rural areas, it is just the
opposite in cities, where speeds are slower and sharp curves rare.
“It’s not like trees jump into the lane,” she noted. Rather, research
shows the presence of roadside vegetation creates a calming effect that
slows speeds, and thereby reduces both the likelihood and damage from a
collision.
Green streets in “ultra-urban” areas: Denver steps out
But where to find space for more of that vegetation? It turns out
that some of the same techniques that can be used to calm traffic and
create safe zones for people on foot or bicycle also offer opportunities
to introduce more soothing vegetation and ecological functions. Many of
those approaches, as well as case studies, are covered in a guide book
from NACTO released in mid-2017.
Among the cities leading the way in putting all these elements
together is Denver. The city began to rethink its approach to streets as
long ago as a 2008 with an initiative that came to be known as Living
Streets, said Crissy Fanganello, the city’s director of transportation
and mobility. “Working with our advocacy community we began to think
about streets as places and how to design for all users.” The city
adopted a complete streets policy and began installing protected bike
lanes and retrofitting larger streets to reduce speeding and provide
refuges for people on foot.
But then came a post-recession development boom, with growing
numbers of people walking and biking in the city’s denser neighborhoods.
Even as the intensity of development increased, the city also was under
the gun to stop dumping polluted runoff from “impervious surfaces” into
the South Platte River. Although agencies responsible for
transportation, utilities and trees and open space tend to work in silos
with their own funding streams, Denver officials realized that would no
longer be good enough. Over the last couple of years, experts from the
various agencies formed a new joint initiative and with the city’s
engineers developed a ground-breaking guide to retrofitting streets in
“ultra-urban” areas.
“The pollution removal value of green infrastructure is well
established,” Fanganello said. “We want to help prove nationally that it
also can have a traffic calming and safety benefit on our streets.”
A series of path-setting new projects is now in play. As a
showcase for what is possible, contractors in early 2019 will transform
3.5 acres at the intersection of 21st Street at Broadway, between Champa
and Stout Streets, from an asphalted moonscape hazardous to people on
foot and bike to a green plaza with protected bicycle and pedestrian
ways. “Tree trenches” will shade the area while sucking up runoff and
provide a calming green frame for what had been a six-lane speedway. A
“green alley” of plants will separate the bike and pedestrian ways. A
“water quality planter” will transform pavement into a lush garden spot
worthy of lingering. “The project started as a traffic signal and bike
lane, but we worked together to make it something much more,” said Brian
Wethington, water quality project manager at Denver Public Works.
In the city’s River North arts district, known as RiNo, work
already is under way along 15 blocks of Brighton Boulevard to convert a
barren stretch of hardscape into an inviting place to walk, bike or wait
for the bus. A first phase of the project is catching half the
stormwater runoff, while a second will capture every drop. Along the
way, the boulevard will be lined with varying “amenity zones” that can
include tree trenches, landscaped planting strips, benches for resting
and art to contemplate. As with 21st Street, the trees provide shade for
those on foot, while plantings will separate cars from bikes and bikes
from pedestrians.
How to fund innovative street design? Seattle looks for a breakthrough
Over in the Pacific time zone, Seattle has been an early adopter
of ideas around green and complete streets. It was the first big city to
adopt a complete streets ordinance, calling for all significant street
maintenance and construction projects to improve safety for people on
foot and bike. In 2015, it became one of the first American cities to
adopt Vision Zero. In the mid- 2000s Seattle also was a pioneer in
redesigning streets both for managing stormwater with nature and safer
walking, remaking a 12-block grid with new sidewalks, landscaping to
“enhance the pedestrian experience in the neighborhood,” all while
benefiting wildlife habitat and improving water quality.
The challenge for Seattle has not been developing and
demonstrating integrated thinking about streets, but overcoming the
funding silos that make innovative projects so difficult. But with a
nation-leading population influx and a forest of cranes looming
overhead, Seattle has no choice but to overcome that obstacle if it
hopes to keep people moving while meeting goals such as maintaining 30
percent tree canopy, said City Councilmember Rob Johnson.
“I see green infrastructure and complete streets as inextricably
related,” said Johnson, who recently and successfully championed
significant funding for green infrastructure in the street
rights-of-way. “But it means changing longstanding habits of thinking
about urban infrastructure, how we build and how we fund it.”
While the city always has more needs than money, the challenge
has been more about agencies syncing up available dollars with each
other’s plans. The city’s water utility, for example, has substantial
funds dedicated to green infrastructure as part of its commitment in a
2015 consent decree to reduce untreated sewage and stormwater flowing
into waterways. But that money can only be used in the limited areas
where soils permit adequate drainage, said Mami Hara, general
manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities (SPU).
Regulatory compliance has been our driver,” Hara said. “Flood
prevention and other uses of green infrastructure are not part of that
equation.” That’s why Hara, who was recruited from GSI pioneer
Philadelphia, to expand its use in Seattle, was thrilled when City
Council approved six years’ worth of funding to go “beyond compliance.”
“We now have two buckets of funds: one for compliance and the other that
can address localized flooding, ameliorating impacts of densification
to manage stormwater and surface pollution.”
That frees the agency to partner more with the Seattle Department
of Transportation (SDOT), which is undergoing an aggressive effort —
funded in part by the city’s largest-ever transportation levy — to
redesign and add sidewalks and bike ways on a multitude of streets in
the face of rapidly escalating demand. The two agencies have tried to
establish consistent lines of communication so that they partner on
projects, regardless of who initiates them. So, for example, when SDOT
has a project under its Safe Routes to School funding umbrella, planners
can incorporate green features in the curb bulbs used to narrow street
crossings around schools, or add swales and street trees, said Brian
Dougherty, who oversees the program at SDOT. Likewise, SDOT works to put
the “green” into neighborhood greenways, corridors that are designed to
be safe for families and all ages to walk or bike. “We always try to
add vegetation where we can, whether or not it serves a specific
stormwater management function,” Dougherty said.
The next big hurdle: Getting legal authority and policy direction
to do joint projects with private developers and other entities. “We
are not just looking at parsing out public money for projects here and
there,” said Hara. “We have to find ways to partner and leverage private
investment as well.”
Working equity into the equation
When city governments scan the landscape for areas with dangerous
conditions for pedestrians, a propensity to flood or a lack of tree
canopy and soothing vegetation, more often as not they find themselves
in low-income neighborhoods of color, said Denver’s Fanganello.
“Equity is important to talk about,” she said. Here again,
funding streams and regulatory habits can be an impediment. “Typically,
when we have done landscape improvements along a roadway, the city would
put in capital, but we would need an entity like a local improvement
district to maintain it. The areas of the city that can do that usually
are more affluent. This can mean that the very areas where more people
are hurt or killed on the street are not seeing the amenities and
benefits.” Denver has more recently established a policy of maintaining
green and complete streets in low-income areas, she said.
Seattle, too, is working to apply an equity lens in choosing
projects. “Part of going ‘beyond compliance’ for us is to try to
prioritize the vulnerable neighborhoods that have flooding problems and
need green space,” said Shanti Colwell, GSI program manager at SPU.
A growing body of research shows green and complete streets
provide particular public health and safety benefits to low-income
neighborhoods and communities of color, though the bonuses are not
limited to that population, said Wolf. “Going to parks is great, but not
as important as the connectivity through neighborhoods,” she said.
“That’s why green streets are so important: They are good for children
getting to school, people walking to work or transit, or to do errands.
These environments encourage and even motivate people to go out and be
active, and they reduce stress. They’re critical to a healthy, thriving
city.”
David A. Goldberg is a nationally recognized journalist and
founding communications director of two national nonprofits, Smart
Growth America and Transportation for America. In 2002, Mr. Goldberg was
awarded a Loeb Fellowship at Harvard University, where he studied urban
policy.